Wednesday, July 31, 2013

Sinking Stone


Notes of Concern…
                …Jackson Blair


Sinking Stone



On July 24th the last hospitalized victim of the Boston bombers was released from the hospital.

He lost a leg.

He had 49 surgeries during his stay.

Shortly before his release Rolling Stone Magazine put his attacker on their cover. They did not use a picture of the terrorist at work. Instead, they used a picture that was called fluffed and buffed.

It amazes me that we continue to ignore the truly injured and champion the villains.

I think of the family that went to Boston to watch the Marathon. These cold-blooded killers walked right up to that family, placed a bomb at their feet, and walked away. That family lost a young son. The daughter lost a leg. The mother had shrapnel in her brain.

Are any of these people featured on the cover of a magazine?

I am sorry if the terrorist had a tough childhood.

I am sorry if the terrorist had a dysfunctional family.

I am sorry if the terrorist could not stand up to his older brother.

But at the end of the day, the terrorist went along with his brother, placed those bombs at the feet of the innocents, killed an MIT policeman just to get his gun, and then ran over his own brother as he tried to escape the police.

This may well be my shortest column.

But I want it to be one of the most important.

If you have a dysfunctional family, a very persuasive brother, and are a religious zealot you still do not get to kill and maim innocent people without suffering the judgment of society.

Rolling Stone should be ashamed. Frankly, I hope every American with a conscience cancels their subscription. We cannot encourage this kind of journalism. It speaks so badly of us.

I am ashamed of their self -serving attempt to sell the magazine with an outrageous cover.

I am ashamed they tried to present this terrible terrorist in a more favorable light.

This is not news. This is pandering to the lowest level of our desire to make heroes out of criminals.

Let’s be better than this.















The writer welcomes your comments, ideas and suggestions.
Please take a moment to share your views on the topic by emailing
 jacksonblair@gmail.com or leaving a comment on his blog at
www.blair-notes.blogspot.com

For further information:  jacksonblair@gmail.com

Friday, July 19, 2013

Martin & Zimmerman

-->
Notes of Concern
           …Jackson Blair


Martin & Zimmerman



Two men met on a fateful night.

Words passed between them and a fight ensued.

One of the men had a gun and he used it to defend himself.

That was the decision of a jury of his peers.

Subsequently, plenty of people in America made their own determinations. And they acted accordingly.

Let us look at the facts.

George Zimmerman probably was not an upstanding citizen out to protect his fellow residents of his apartment complex.

Trayvon Martin probably was not the innocent young black male the media has described.

These two men met on turf known to them both and the situation escalated. After a period of undenied assault, Martin died of a gunshot wound.

The police at the outset did not want to arrest Zimmerman. Public pressure changed that.

The judge in the trial did not allow race to be an issue in the proceeding.

Therefore, the issue became self-defense.

Many of the people watching the proceedings on television believed there was a racial motive to the shooting.

However, in the courtroom that possibility was not allowed and the jury was required to determine if Zimmerman fired his gun in an attempt to defend himself.

The jury believed that Zimmerman was being beaten and had every right to defend himself.

He was acquitted.

The world is aflame about the decision.

Let us cut this jury some slack.

They were not permitted to consider racial motives.

They saw evidence that Zimmerman was beaten. Clearly, he was.

He used his legally owned weapon to defend his life.

There is no question Martin was beating Zimmerman.

The wounds were photographed and logged in by the police.

Now, being Americans who were not in the court room, did not see the evidence, and who did not have the same direction from the judge, many believed an injustice was committed.

I would argue that the judge set the parameters for the decision and the jury reached the only decision possible to them.

Undoubtedly, Trayvon Martin should not have died. No matter the degree of his involvement in this death is not the prescribed penalty.

Undoubtedly, George Zimmerman was being beaten and feared for his life. If he had not placed himself in that situation the attack would not have taken place.

Martin should not have paid with his life. Zimmerman should not have been expected to take a beating.

I have sympathy for the jury.

People would like us to believe that Martin was targeted and died because he was black.

I recall the O.J. Simpson trial where he appeared to be exonerated of murders that most of us felt he committed. The fact that no one raised the possibility that this black, an admired and respected sport hero, might have been released because of who he was flies in the face of assuming Zimmerman was acquitted because he was white.

Not one of us knows what transpired between Zimmerman and Martin. Not one of us knows how threatened Zimmerman felt. Not one of us knows how affronted Martin felt. What we know is that Zimmerman was beaten and defended himself. Whether he deserved to be beaten is not an issue.

The jury reached the only decision that was legally possible in the trial I followed.

The President of the United States should be making no comments on a matter that his justice department says it is still investigating.

People should not be rioting or marching anywhere unless there is a question suggesting someone meddled with a properly constituted jury that reached a decision based on the law as explained by the presiding judge.

Everyone thinks they know what happened on that dark wet night.

No one knows what happened on that dark wet night except a teenager who died and cannot comment and the only survivor who was investigated, questioned, tried and found innocent.















The writer welcomes your comments, ideas and suggestions.
Please take a moment to share your views on the topic by emailing
 jacksonblair@gmail.com or leaving a comment on his blog at
www.blair-notes.blogspot.com

For further information:  jacksonblair@gmail.com

Thursday, July 11, 2013

REVISIT THE APPRENTICE

-->
Notes of Concern…
                      …Jackson Blair

______________________________________ 

Revisit the Apprentice



Take a look at the budget for your local public school system.

Find the antacids!

And if your child is in private boarding school you are probably paying tuition, of after tax dollars, between $35,000 and $60,000.

Find the antacids!

You will spend much of your adult life saving money to pay the high cost of tuition at the college and university of choice for your children. And many of those children will leave school with staggering debt. “According to the Federal Reserve Bank, two-thirds of college graduates leave with some debt, and 37 million Americans are repaying a student loan right now (Walsh in ‘We Must Hate Our Children.’”

We are like lemmings. We do this just because we are supposed to do it. We do it because parents hope their children will be better off in a future world. And they think this is the only way. There are lots of paths to success in the world. And while it is true that most involve learning, they do not all require “formal/classroom” learning.

I suggest that you suspend the belief that more and more classroom learning is the only key to success and look at the facts.

You will go into retirement with far less than you need because of all the taxes, costs of raising children, and huge cost of home owning.  A significant portion of this outlay of monies relates to education.

The payoff is supposed to be that your children will go out into the world and enjoy a good life.

You read the newspapers. You watch the television news. Do you really think the payoff is there?

What I see are over- educated young men and women who cannot find work in their chosen field.

For those who do find careers the high cost of paying off their education debt is overwhelming.

I see young people regularly purchasing homes that cost hundreds of thousands of dollars more than I paid for our first home when I was in my twenties. And I see banks encouraging them to do it.

So between paying off debts, the costs of living day-to-day, and the uncertainty of the job market we have young couples loaded up with stress.

Here is a revolutionary suggestion: the system will not provide a better life for our children.

In my young life I was a banker with a very large Midwest bank that made many mortgage loans. We were taught never to lend mortgage money to anyone who did not have a 20% down payment ( unless they qualified for a federally insured loan (FHA) that permitted a 10% down payment.) We had another rule: the cost of the house purchased could not exceed a 250 percent of the borrower’s income.

These two simple provisions guaranteed young people were buying something they could afford. Further, they were buying something that could decrease in value without putting them “underwater.”

What happened between then and now? When did we throw out the good rules and begin playing with no rules?

I trace the problem to the indiscriminate issuing of credit cards and the lessening of banking regulation.

Not too long ago banks would loan you 110% of the value of the house you were buying so you could upgrade the things you wanted to change. Money was available everywhere.

No credit?

No problem!

What if the housing markets tanks?

Won’t happen!

Well, the lack of having basic credit rules came back to bite us.

The housing market did tank.

We need to get back to basics. It is time for us to take control of the costs of preparing children for a future and to be certain it is a realistic future. And it is a time for returning to the basic principles that should be in place for lending money.

In the early days of our slide to irresponsibility I served on a committee of one of the most prestigious business schools in the United States.

The Dean called me to ask me to serve on a committee that would be making fast track MBA degrees available to very bright students who had pursued a terminal degree, a PhD, in a subject field only to find there were no jobs available in that field. Now these brilliant young people needed to actually study something that would land them a job. So they wanted to come back for a business degree but they did not want to put in the two years the other students had to commit to their studies.

The committee was named Alternative Careers for PhDs.

I attended the first meeting. I came away with the following observations:

Really bright students earned a PhD after years and years of study without once looking to see if there was any demand for their newly acquired knowledge in the marketplace. This did not seem to me to qualify as a definition of “bright.”

Students who knew from the beginning that a business degree was marketable and were willing to study for two additional years to earn an MBA were to be faced with a bunch of PhD holders who would get the coveted MBA in half the time. And the reason for this was that they were so smart they qualified for a PhD.

I resigned from the committee.

I left with the realization that parents had not taught their children about the marketplace. And teachers, counselors and mentors had failed those young people, too.

There was a day, long ago, where you were apprenticed to someone who already knew what you wanted to learn and who practiced the trade.

You worked while you learned.

Your classroom was the everyday experience of actually working and learning.

These apprenticeships were available not only with plumbers, electricians, carpenters but with bankers, teachers and newspapers. It was highly desirable in European countries to seek an apprenticeship.

These young men and women did not enter the world of work with thousands of dollars of debt. They received wages commensurate with their knowledge, wages that were raised as they became more competent. The teacher, the actual worker, got help at a reduced cost in return for sharing his wisdom.

Maybe we ought to take a long look at what was good in the past.

There were some pretty good ideas out there during the time of apprenticeships. There were some wonderfully trained young people coming out of that experience. And more than a few of them were collecting salaries eventually that well exceeded what the new college degree holders could command.

If you are in the position to consider taking on an apprentice, but never gave it any thought, perhaps you could revisit the idea. Find a hard working and talented young person, hire them, train them and prepare them for a realistic future…one with a much greater guarantee of success.

If you are a parent facing the huge burden of the cost of education, maybe you should talk to your child about being an apprentice.

And if you are taking out loans to realize your dreams, no one is stopping you from applying the two measures I suggested earlier when commenting about reasonable borrowing, measures that would go a long way to providing financial stability in your life.












The writer welcomes your comments, ideas and suggestions.
Please take a moment to share your views on the topic by emailing
 jacksonblair@gmail.com or leaving a comment on his blog at
www.blair-notes.blogspot.com

Saturday, July 6, 2013

ARUGULA or STEAK

-->
Notes of Concern…
            …Jackson Blair


ARUGULA or STEAK



Summer is springing out all over!

I was at the nursery the other day selecting colorful plants for window boxes and urns. It is an annual venture to which I look forward.

You walk into a large nursery filled with many colors and lots of fragrances, not to mention the artful way the nursery owners have displayed their wares.

It is an assault on your senses.

A good assault!

I am a lazy gardener. I like to see plants already in bloom. I want to evaluate the color combinations. And I want to picture them displayed at my place.

I am told real gardeners work from seeds or from cuttings. To me that might be admirable but requires a lot of faith in one’s own gardening abilities. And it requires a lot of work. I am a man who prizes efficiency.

My wife had requested that I plant some arugula for her at our summer place. I ventured forward from one nursery to another looking for some arugula that someone else had started and some that already showed growth.

It was a fruitless search.

Every time I explained what I wanted I was taken to the seed rack.

I finally succumbed. It was either buy seeds or face the wrath of my wife.

Easy choice.

A little package of seeds.

Lay out $1.99 and walk off with something the size of one-half a standard size envelope.

When I got to the garden I read the directions. This was an astounding moment.

It appears that inside my little envelope were many, many little seeds. Each of these seeds was supposed to be planted one half inch apart and one eighth of an inch deep.

Like that was going to happen!

I could never see me with a measuring tape in hand dropping little seeds one at a time into the newly turned over dirt while measuring the width and depth of each little hole.

With superior male reasoning I assumed that some of the seeds were probably good and others probably wouldn’t grow. If one clumped the seeds together would it not mean you would simply have a fuller patch of arugula?

No need for overkill here.

More importantly, if I followed these directions I would have to dig a trench the whole way across the yard to get these little seeds placed as the instructions indicated. It would be like putting in a sewer line to the road.

I got a long window box.

I used my finger to create a furrow.

I dumped the seeds along the furrow.

I watered.

Voila! arugula seeds planted in two minutes.

Now the success of my arugula experiment is in the hands of God.

If success is not to be mine I will just go to the grocer and buy my wife whatever arugula she needs for her salad.

But I secretly think that my approach to planting arugula is going to revolutionize the healthy- eating industry and cut down significantly on labor.

Bottom line-who eats this healthy stuff anyway.

You don’t have to plant seeds to acquire a good steak!













The writer welcomes your comments, ideas and suggestions.
Please take a moment to share your views on the topic by emailing
 jacksonblair@gmail.com or leaving a comment on his blog at
www.blair-notes.blogspot.com

For further information:  jacksonblair@gmail.com